In Italy there is an ongoing debate about the opportunity to maintain on food labels the indication of the address of the production site of a food as a mandatory particular. This provision was not expressly foreseen under Directive 2000/13/EC and is not mentioned in the Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011. It was in fact a particular that only Italian law requested on mandatory basis (Legislative Decree No 109/1992 implementing Directive 2000/13).
The Italian Government has not notified any draft law requiring indication of such information to date. This means that at the moment provision of information about production site is no longer required for food labels, although some political parties are strongly asking to reintroduce this obligation.
In this respect,the European Commission has clarified under which circumstances this indication may be legally justified and that information on origin or provenance must not be intended as a tool neither for fraud prevention, nor for protection of public health.
Question for written answer to the Commission – Elisabetta Gardini (PPE) – 2nd February 2015
Subject: Information regarding food production sites
It is becoming increasingly difficult for European consumers to identify the geographical and production origins of goods due to the growing trend of selling items under the distributors’ brand. In addition, multinational groups are able to relocate their production sites to an entirely different country without needing to inform consumers, who may then be misled when trademarks implying incorrect geographical origins continue to be used.
Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011, which entered into force on 14 December 2014, contains no provision for mandatory indications of food production sites — this omission has raised serious concerns amongst producers and strong objections from consumers in a number of Member States.
1. In light of the above and following the statements made on 17 January 2015 by the Italian Minister for Agriculture, Food and Forestry Policies, Maurizio Martina, can the Commission confirm whether Member States are able to adopt measures rendering this information mandatory, justified on grounds of the protection of public health, but also for the prevention of fraud — as detailed in Article 39 of the above Regulation?
2. Does the Commission intend to clarify obligatory indications of country of origin for foods in all instances where omitting said indication could mislead consumers, including for reason detailed above?
Answer given by Mr Andriukaitis on behalf of the Commission – 27th February 2015
Article 39 paragraph 1 of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 provides an exhaustive list of possible justifications for Member States to adopt measures requiring additional mandatory particulars for specific types or categories of foods. Paragraph 2 of that Article specifies that Member States may introduce measures concerning the mandatory indication of the country of origin or place of provenance of foods only where there is a proven link between certain qualities of the food and its origin or provenance and when evidence is provided that the majority of consumers attach significant value to the provision of this information. The Commission would like however to clarify that it does not consider information on origin or provenance neither as a tool for the prevention of fraud, nor as a tool for the protection of public health. There are other mechanisms in place to ensure the safety and the traceability of food.
Article 26 paragraph 2(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 already requests the indication of the country of origin or place of provenance when its omission might mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the food, in particular if the information accompanying the food or the label, such as the trademark mentioned by the Honourable Member, would otherwise imply a different origin.
(Source: European Parliament)
3 thoughts on “QeA to EU Commission – Mandatory information about the food production site”
Interesting Cesare. Reminds me of the English brand “ovaltine” which is a milk flavouring product that I used to purchase since I do not like the taste of milk and bought because I thought it was healthier than other products in the market… mixture of malt extract, whey, (chocolate in the version I bought), and some sugar. Also used it to flavour my daughter’s hot milk drink when she was a child. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ovaltine I stopped purchasing it when about 4 years ago noticed it seemed sweeter and it is now produced in Asia. Yes, perhaps unfair of me but due to a “country of origin” effect and mistrust. Dolores Smith Canada The Olivar Corp
I think you need to make clear that the name and address of the seller, distributor or manufacturer is still a requirement as it was in the 1996 food labelling regs
Thank you Mike, you are probably right. Your comment will avoid confusion to anyone is not familiar with the issue.