Food recalls in EU – Week 39/2015

This week on the EU RASFF (Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed) we can find the following notifications:

1. Alerts followed by a recall from consumers:

2. Information for attention/for follow up followed by a recall from consumers:


3. Alerts followed by a withdrawal from the market:

4. Seizures:


5. Border rejections:

  • absence of health certificate(s) for groundnuts from India
  • aflatoxins (B1 = 10.36; Tot. = 11.43 / B1 = 10.36; Tot. = 11.43 µg/kg – ppb) in groundnuts from China
  • aflatoxins (B1 = 180; Tot. = 200 µg/kg – ppb) in nutmeg from Indonesia
  • aflatoxins (B1 = 32.27; Tot. = 217.24 µg/kg – ppb) in hazelnuts from Turkey
  • chilled paprika chopped in pieces, dried paprika and paprika stems from China infested with moulds
  • chlorpyrifos (3.1 mg/kg – ppm) and dicofol (0.16 mg/kg – ppm) in peppers in brine from Morocco
  • excessive humidity of black pepper from Vietnam infested with moulds
  • lead (0.141 mg/kg – ppm) in sheathed woodtuft (Pholiota mutabilis) from China
  • FCM: migration of chromium (0.4 mg/kg – ppm) from steel knives for cheese from China and steel knives from Hong Kong
  • propamocarb (0.045; 0.087 mg/kg – ppm) and unauthorised substance carbendazim (0.031 mg/kg – ppm) in quinoa and chia seeds from Peru
  • Salmonella (presence /25g) in frozen salted chicken breast from Thailand
  • Salmonella (presence /25g) in and hulled sesame seeds from India
  • Salmonella Derby (presence /25g) and Salmonella Lexington (presence /25g) in rapeseed cake from Belarus
  • thawed frozen cuttlefish (Sepia aculeata) from India
  • too high content of sulphite (175; 245 mg/kg – ppm) and unauthorised use of colour E 102 – tartrazine (presence) in pickled sour mustard from Thailand
  • unauthorised novel food ingredient Casearia sylvestris and novel food ingredient Cuphea (Cuphea carthaginensis) in herbal tea from Brazil
  • unauthorised substance dithiocarbamates (0.14 mg/kg – ppm) in vine leaves in brine from Turkey
  • unauthorised substances profenofos (0.022 mg/kg – ppm) and chlorfenapyr (0.04 mg/kg – ppm) in red chilli from Laos, via Vietnam

EFSA final aspartame evaluation as safe

Aspartame and its breakdown products are safe for human consumption at current levels of exposure, EFSA concludes in its first full risk assessment of this sweetener. To carry out its risk assessment, EFSA has undertaken a rigorous review of all available scientific research on aspartame and its breakdown products, including both animal and human studies.


“This opinion represents one of the most comprehensive risk assessments of aspartame ever undertaken. It’s a step forward in strengthening consumer confidence in the scientific underpinning of the EU food safety system and the regulation of food additives”, said the Chair of EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Foods (ANS Panel), Dr Alicja Mortensen.


Experts of ANS Panel have considered all available information and, following a detailed analysis, have concluded that the current Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) of 40mg/kg bw/day is protective for the general population. However, in patients suffering from the medical condition phenylketonuria (PKU), the ADI is not applicable, as they require strict adherence to a diet low in


English: aspartame; Asp-Phe methyl ester Deuts...
English: aspartame; Asp-Phe methyl ester Deutsch: Aspartam; Asp-Phe Methylester (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


(an amino acid found in proteins).


Following a thorough review of evidence provided both by animal and human studies, experts have ruled out a potential risk of aspartame causing damage to genes and inducing cancer. EFSA’s experts also concluded that aspartame does not harm the brain, the nervous system or affect behaviour or cognitive function in children or adults. With respect to pregnancy, the Panel noted that there was no risk to the developing fetus from exposure to phenylalanine derived from aspartame at the current ADI (with the exception of women suffering from PKU).


The opinion makes clear that the breakdown products of aspartame (phenylalanine, methanol and aspartic acid) are also naturally present in other foods (for instance, methanol is found in fruit and vegetables). The contribution of breakdown products of aspartame to the overall dietary exposure to these substances is low.


The opinion describes the criteria used to identify the studies relevant for the risk assessment and standards applied to evaluate the scientific evidence. EFSA’s experts examined all uncertainties related to the evaluation of aspartame. The opinion explains how these were addressed in the risk assessment to ensure that potential risks from aspartame were not underestimated.


The comprehensive review carried out by the ANS Panel was made possible following two public calls for data which made available a large body of scientific information, comprising both published and previously unpublished data and studies.


EFSA received over 200 comments during the public consultation on the draft opinion (that took place from 9 January 2013 to 15 February 2013) and all of these were considered. During the consultative phase EFSA also held a hearing with interested parties to discuss its draft opinion and the feedback received from the online public consultation. EFSA’s dialogue with stakeholders revealed that there were important aspects of the draft opinion that needed to be clarified in the final output.


EFSA is also publishing today the comments on the draft opinion received during the public consultation, its responses to the comments received and a statement on two recent publications, one from the US Environmental Protection Agency and the other Gift et al., that were brought to EFSA’s attention after the closure of the public consultation. Neither of these studies alters EFSA’s conclusion on aspartame.



(Source: EFSA Website)


Related articles